|
Assessment Copyright © 1987-2005
CompanyLongName
The
challenge is in assigning limits to Telematics activities in a way that it
will not interfere with safety, nor will it inconvenience a driver in a
controllable driving situation. This is done by assessing the over all
driving system and weighing it against known risks to the driver and to
others.
The
assessment is a two step approach. The first step define a specific
activity and assesses its effect when carried out under driving condition.
An event classified as a A Rank is an event that needs to be fully
controlled and possibly altogether banned from usage while driving, while an
event classified as a D Rank is an event that does not require any type of
oversight.
| |
Device usage ranking
Copyright © 1987-2005
CompanyLongName |
|
|
Categories |
Rank |
|
|
Effect |
A |
B |
C |
D |
|
1 |
Likely AND/OR Known
to cause distraction AND accidents |
X |
? |
? |
? |
|
2 |
Likely BUT NOT
Known to cause distraction AND accidents |
? |
X |
? |
? |
|
3 |
May Cause
distraction or accident |
? |
? |
X |
? |
|
4 |
NOT Likely AND NOT
Known to cause Distraction AND Accident |
? |
? |
? |
X |
|
The second step is more application specific
then the first step. This step examines the functionality along with the
type of vehicle, the type of application the vehicle is used
for.
An Item ranked as A is an Item that is required and sufficient
intelligence should be applied in the design to allow the functionality
without introducing risks associated with such functionality |
|
Application usage ranking
Copyright © 1987-2005
CompanyLongName |
|
1-Clearly
separating what’s: |
|
1 a- Important for safe
driving |
|
Class A |
| |
|
|
1a.1- Subject Vehicle |
|
Class A-S |
| |
|
|
1a.2- Other
Vehicles |
|
Class A-O
|
| |
|
2-a Important to
drivers |
|
Class B |
| |
|
3-a “Nice to Have” for
drivers |
|
Class C |
| |
|
4-a “Important/Nice to
Have” for Passengers |
|
Class D |
|
2- Assuring driver
intent |
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
3: Simplicity |
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
4: Accessibility |
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
5: High Availability |
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
6: Universality |
|
|
|
|
Class B |
|
7: Portability |
|
|
|
|
Class B |
|
8: Privacy |
|
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
9: Cost |
|
|
|
|
Class C |
The
Matrices will be used to Assess, (not measure or quantify), the type
of work load that a Telematics activity can add to the driving task. Based
on the assessment, the result will put the type of controls necessary on
such Telematics devices so as to reduce the risk associated with such usage.
The control should aim to allow the driver (Depending on the Vehicle
application), to use Telematics but under a more favorable driving
conditions, e.g., not “zig zaging”, Not Driving over Known Speed limits, Not
Racing etc.
If the
driving system activity is border line in terms of known risk or suspected
risk, that activity is pushed to the next highest criteria. This is
not inconvenience to the user, because the user will still be able to use
the said device by compromising on driving options.
Using STMC
GatewayTM, the system will evaluate these limits and decrease such limit if
they are deemed to be too strict for the normal driving condition of the
driver.Copyright ©
1987-2005
CompanyLongName |